ONE Championship’s CEO, Chatri Sityodtong, finds himself in a heated debate with Thai striker Superlek Kiatmoo9 regarding the controversial bout switch involving Nabil Anane at ONE 172 in Tokyo. The saga unfolds as conflicting narratives emerge about the decision to alter the fight format.
Superlek claimed in a recent interview that he was willing to go five rounds and was taken aback when the contest was modified to three rounds due to his weight issue. However, Chatri presented a different perspective, stating, “Superlek did not agree to keep the fight at five rounds after missing weight.”
The event, initially intended to unify the bantamweight Muay Thai titles between Superlek and Nabil Anane, took an unexpected turn when Superlek failed hydration protocols and subsequently lost his championship belt. Despite Nabil being prepared for a title shot by making weight, the match transformed into a non-title three-round showdown.
Chatri revealed that it was Superlek who insisted on reducing the fight duration, contrary to claims made by the fighter himself. This revelation adds layers of complexity to an already contentious situation.
While Superlek alluded to potential injuries affecting his performance leading up to the match, he expressed interest in a rematch with Nabil in the future. In light of these developments, discussions surrounding Nabil facing Jonathan Haggerty for the vacant title gain momentum.
The contrasting accounts from both sides highlight the intricacies of professional sports negotiations and shed light on the behind-the-scenes dynamics governing high-stakes athletic competitions. As fans speculate on what transpired backstage during this eventful chapter in ONE Championship history, one thing remains clear: disputes like these are not uncommon in the world of elite combat sports.
Leave feedback about this